Log in Register

Login to your account

Password *
Remember Me

Create an account

Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Password *
Verify password *
Email *
Verify email *
Captcha *


Volume 349:2136-2146 - November 27, 2003 - Number 22

Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Howard R. Mertz, M.D.

Irritable bowel syndrome, a common disorder in which bowel habits are altered in association with abdominal pain or discomfort, has a prevalence of 12 percent among adults in the United States and a similar prevalence worldwide.1 By definition, no mechanical, biochemical, or overt inflammatory condition explains the symptoms. Validated, symptom-based criteria for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome are highly predictive in the absence of alarming symptoms such as weight loss, fever, and intestinal bleeding.2,3,4 The pain or discomfort experienced by patients with irritable bowel syndrome often leads to health care use and a decreased quality of life.5,6,7 Diarrhea is a symptom that often leads to medical consultation,5 since it can be inconvenient and, if associated with urgency, may be accompanied by fecal incontinence, an altered lifestyle (owing to frequent trips to the bathroom), and anxiety. Constipation may be associated with bloating, discomfort, and an altered body image. The quality of life was reported as impaired in people with irritable bowel syndrome who sought medical care but only marginally reduced in those who did not seek medical care.8,9 The therapeutic goal is both a reduction in the severity and frequency of symptoms and an overall improvement in the quality of life.

An onset after the age of 50 years is unusual. Women have a higher prevalence of symptoms than men (2:1 ratio). Patients seen in clinics, particularly those who are referred for irritable bowel syndrome, appear to have a high frequency of psychosocial stress or dysfunction associated with the condition. However, persons with irritable bowel syndrome who do not seek medical care have no more psychological symptoms than unaffected controls.5,10 Since psychosocial stress appears to predict both the use of health care and the persistence of symptoms, the patient's social history is relevant to therapy, and clinicians should attempt to determine what has triggered each consultation.11


Figure 1). Some studies,12,14 but not all,15 reported increased small-bowel and colonic contractions temporally associated with abdominal pain. Heightened sensitivity to visceral distention, particularly that which is perceived as noxious, has been described in numerous studies.13,16Interplay between motor and sensory dysfunction appears to explain the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. The gastrointestinal effects of stress in animals and humans include increased small-bowel and colonic motility and increased visceral sensitivity.17,18 These effects appear to be exaggerated in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, as well as in animals previously sensitized by either visceral inflammation or psychological trauma.19,20,21

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1.Alterations in the Colonic Motility Index (Panel A) and Gut Sensitivity (Panel B) in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

The gastrocolic reflex is augmented in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. As indicated in Panel A, the mean (±SE) motility of the sigmoid colon is greater after meals in patients than in control subjects as measured by manometry. Data have been adapted from Rogers et al.12 Patients with irritable bowel syndrome also have hypersensitivity of the gut. As a rectosigmoid balloon is progressively inflated, a greater proportion of patients report pain than do control subjects (Panel B). This distention often reproduces the pain of irritable bowel syndrome. Data have been adapted from Ritchie.13

22 The gastrointestinal sensory-motor dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome is consistent with an up-regulation in neural processing between the gut and the brain, termed the "brain–gut axis." Indeed, therapies for irritable bowel syndrome are generally directed at gastrointestinal motor, gastrointestinal sensory, or central nervous system processing.

Nonpharmacologic Therapies

A firm diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome based on validated symptom criteria,2,3 the absence of alarming symptoms, and a normal physical examination, coupled with limited relevant diagnostic testing, is reassuring to patients. Identification of psychosocial stressors that trigger or maintain symptoms should lead to supportive advice and lifestyle modification, which often reduces the number of visits to physicians.23 Patients generally seek dietary advice, but specific diets or elimination diets have not been proven effective. Some studies indicate that elimination diets followed by sequential reintroduction of specific foods can be useful, though in these studies, patients and investigators were not blinded to the excluded foods. Furthermore, when no offending foods were identified during the reintroduction phase of the diet, most patients nevertheless did well.24

A reasonable approach to nonpharmacologic management includes avoidance of dietary excesses, caffeine, and dietary triggers the patient suspects of leading to symptoms. Moderation in fat intake is reasonable, since lipids amplify gut sensations and motor reflexes — effects that may be heightened in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.25 Patients with diarrhea as the predominant symptom may have lactose intolerance or excess fruitor sorbitol intake that may exacerbate symptoms. Patients in whom constipation predominates may have inadequate fiber intake as a contributing factor. In patients with symptoms of bloating or flatulence, avoiding beans, cabbage, and uncooked broccoli and cauliflower may help. Exercise has been associated with improved outcomes in uncontrolled studies and is reasonable as a general recommendation.26

The Placebo Effect and Irritable Bowel Syndrome

27,28 A salutary placebo effect appears to last at least three months.27,28 As a result, the findings of any studies of therapy for irritable bowel syndrome that are not randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled are difficult to interpret. In clinical practice, the placebo effect makes short-term effects of therapeutic trials difficult to interpret as well.

Fiber Supplements

Oral fiber supplementation has been widely recommended as therapy for irritable bowel syndrome, though supporting data are lacking. Fiber is indigestible plant carbohydrate (primarily cellulose, hemicellulose pectins, and lignins) that colonic bacteria metabolize into gas, fluid, and short-chain fatty acids. Fiber supplementation results in softer, wetter, bulkier stool, which can promote colonic peristalsis and ease defecation. Fiber accelerates stool transit in both control subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome and chronic constipation.29 30,31,32 In fact, many patients who take fiber, particularly those with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, have worsening of symptoms.32,33 Since fiber may take one to three days to traverse the gut, symptoms of constipation may get worse before they improve. Patients should be advised of this possibility, and gradual introduction of fiber may be tried.


Psychosocial stressors are important triggers for the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, and patients who seek a consultation for irritable bowel syndrome have a greater prevalence of psychological diagnoses than those who do not seek medical care. Thus, psychotherapy is expected to be useful. A variety of psychotherapy techniques, including cognitive behavioral therapy (directed at maladaptive perceptions of illness and behavior), dynamic psychotherapy (directed at interpersonal problems), relaxation therapy, and hypnotherapy, alone or in combination, are reportedly effective for symptoms.34,35,36,37,38,39 A review of psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome identified 12 randomized, controlled trials in which the level of symptoms was the primary outcome38; 8 of these reported positive responses to psychotherapy. Two studies indicated that the marked improvement in symptoms during initial psychotherapy lasted for up to one year.34,36 Diarrhea and pain appear to respond to psychotherapy, whereas constipation does not. Patients with anxiety or depression appear to have a better outcome in response to psychotherapy than do patients without these conditions.34

It is difficult to blind patients to psychotherapy treatment; none of the published trials of psychotherapy are double-blind or placebo-controlled. In most trials patients are not representative of those seen in general practice but, rather, are identified in tertiary practices and are willing to enroll in therapy. Furthermore, psychotherapy requires a skilled practitioner, so results from selected centers may not be reproduced in general practice. Despite these caveats, psychotherapy is considered useful for selected patients with irritable bowel syndrome, particularly those who have relatively severe or refractory symptoms or prominent psychosocial issues.

Nonspecific Bowel-Directed Therapy

Initial therapy for irritable bowel syndrome should include measures to reduce specific symptoms related to constipation and diarrhea. Often in patients with constipation, regular passage of stool will reduce pain and bloating. Although antidiarrheal agents do not reduce the pain of irritable bowel syndrome, they can improve the quality of life if they decrease stool urgency and frequency.

Treatment of Constipation

Constipation is a nonspecific symptom reported by patients who have slow transit of the colon, impaired defecation and straining, or a sensitive colon that causes a bloated feeling and a desire to defecate without result.40,41Fiber supplements such as psyllium seed, methylcellulose, and polycarbophil relieve constipation by accelerating stool transit and facilitating defecation. Fiber is unlikely to offer relief for bloating in patients with normal stool frequency. Fiber is also less likely to work for constipation in those with very slow colonic transit (e.g., more than five days between movements). In this situation, long-term use of an osmotic laxative is effective and safe. Magnesium salts, phosphate salts, and polyethylene glycol–based laxatives are effective when taken on a scheduled basis or as needed, and tachyphylaxis is rare.42,43 Nonabsorbed carbohydrate laxatives such as sorbitol and lactulose are effective but expensive and can promote the formation of gas, which many patients find uncomfortable and difficult to expel.25,42 Stimulant cathartics such as bisacodyl and senna are more likely than other agents to cause cramping and are associated with both tachyphylaxis and dependency. In animal models, cathartics induce swelling and fragmentation of enteric neurons.44 For these reasons, long-term use of stimulantcathartics should be avoided.

Antidiarrheal Agents

The opiate and opioid analogues diphenoxylate–atropine and loperamide stimulate receptors in the enteric nervous system that inhibit peristalsis and fluid secretion. Loperamide has demonstrated efficacy against diarrhea, but not pain, in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.45 Medications of the same class, such as diphenoxylate–atropine, would be expected to have similar efficacy.  These agents can be used as needed or according to a schedule. A bile-acid binder such as cholestyramine may be added empirically to control refractory diarrhea. A night-time dose of a bile-acid binder is often very effective after cholecystectomy in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.46

Specific Therapies

Antispasmodic Agents

Antispasmodic agents relax the smooth muscle of the gut or reduce its contractility. Anticholinergic agents, calcium-channel blockers, and opiate antagonists may all act as antispasmodics, though only anticholinergic agents are approved for this indication in the United States (Table 1). Patients with irritable bowel syndrome typically have augmented colonic motility in response to meals (gastrocolic reflex), which can be associated with diarrhea and cramps47 (Figure 1A). Anticholinergic agents can reduce this excessive postprandial contractility.48 The literature regarding various antispasmodic drugs for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome is large; however, many trials lacked appropriate blinding, had small numbers of patients, were of short duration, and used unclear criteria to define a clinical response.

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Antispasmodic Agents.

On balance, data from randomized trials indicate that antispasmodic agents decrease global symptoms and reduce pain. This effect is reviewed in two recent meta-analyses, which suggest that although these agents decrease pain, they have no effect on symptoms of diarrhea and constipation.49,50 The odds ratio for global improvement with antispasmodic agents, as compared with a placebo, exceeds 2.0 on the basis of these two meta-analyses(Table 2), but this apparent beneficial effect may be overestimated, since a trial indicates that the serotonin-3–receptor antagonist alosetron (discussed below) is more effective than an antispasmodic agent, even though the odds ratio for global improvement with alosetron therapy is only 1.7.56

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Drug Therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

The heterogeneity of older studies and publication bias may lead to an overstatement of the effectiveness of antispasmodic medications. The antispasmodic agents available in the United States (Table 1) may not be the most efficacious; however, there are data to support the use of dicyclomine and hyoscyamine.57 In practice, antispasmodic agents taken 30 minutes before meals can substantially inhibit the gastro-colic reflex, reducingpostprandial urgency and cramps. Fast-acting sublingual antispasmodic agents are available that are appropriate for use on an as-needed basis. Long-acting forms are also available. Common but generally mild and rapidly reversible side effects of anticholinergic antispasmodic agents include dry mouth, blurred vision, fatigue, and urinary hesitancy. Narrow-angle glaucoma and urinary retention are contraindications. These drugs can be administered as needed for cramps, before meals that are expected to cause symptoms, or when postprandial symptoms would be relatively inconvenient. Because of the safety, low cost, and utility of antispasmodic agents given on an as-needed basis, these drugs are generally tried first if reassurance and nonspecific therapies fail to control symptoms.

Several formulations have combined benzodiazepine or barbiturate sedatives with anticholinergic drugs. Data from small studies support the efficacy of phenobarbital and belladonna in combination.58,59,60 The combination compounds have a rationale for use and an extensive history. Anxiety increases intestinal motility as part of the stress response, and this response can be blunted by benzodiazepines.61 Sedatives may reduce the central nervous system component of intestinal contractions, whereas antispasmodic agents reduce the intestinal motor response. The risk of dependency or recreational use of the anxiolytic component is very low, since the anticholinergic component causes unpleasant side effects in higher doses. Side effects include those of anticholinergic components and sedation related to anxiolytic agents. The use of alcohol and other sedatives must be avoided if these drugs are taken. Driving and other activities requiring an alert state should be avoided until patients determine whether they can tolerate these drugs. These agents are best used as needed for more severe episodic symptoms when anticholinergic agents alone have failed.

Tricyclic Antidepressants

62,63,64 The underlying mechanism of the benefit is unknown, but it could be due to a reduction in the sensitivity of peripheral nerves or to alterations in the brain.65,66 Although in healthy volunteers tricyclic antidepressants raise both the threshold for and tolerance of cutaneous pain,67,68 these effects have not been convincingly demonstrated in the gut.67,69 In functional bowel disorders, data are mixed regarding the ability of tricyclic antidepressants to alter visceral pain thresholds.70,71 The antidepressant action of tricyclic antidepressants does not appear to be required for the salutary effects of these agents on the gut, since low doses are effective, benefits are seen within two weeks, patients without depression benefit, and full doses of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors do not provide the same benefits.64 In theory, the beneficial effects of tricyclic antidepressants could be due to their anticholinergic properties; however, studies that controlled for this effect have still shown a benefit of treatment.72

A number of randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated decreased symptoms in patients taking low-dose tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline, desipramine, clomipramine, doxepin, and trimipramine. A recent meta-analysis reviewed these treatments for irritable bowel syndrome and indicated an odds ratio for benefit of 4.0 as compared with placebo51 (Table 2). Some studies, but not all, indicate greater benefits in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome than in those with other types.39,72,73 Because side effects include constipation, anticipatory treatment of constipation is suggested if tricyclic antidepressants are used for constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Other side effects include fatigue, somnolence, dry mouth, and urinary retention. In antidepressant doses, tricyclic antidepressants have been associated with cardiac arrhythmia and lowered seizure thresholds. These effects appear exceedingly rare at low doses.

Tricyclic antidepressants are recommended for moderate-to-severe irritable bowel syndrome in which pain is prominent or when other therapies have failed. Tricyclic antidepressants can be combined with antispasmodic agents if either treatment has had partial success. Since somnolence may occur, the drugs should be taken at bedtime. Daily administration starting at a dose of 10 to 25 mg for any of the tricyclic antidepressants, with a gradual escalation to a dose of 25 to 100 mg, is suggested. Although benefits are often seen within a week, a four-week trial is reasonable. Tricyclic antidepressants may be continued for 6 to 12 months, after which an attempt should be made to taper the dose.

Selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors and other newer antidepressants have been widely used to treat irritable bowel syndrome, since they lack many of the side effects of tricyclic antidepressants and have similar efficacy for depression. These agents do not have the same antinociceptive effects as tricyclic antidepressants and have yet to be proved effective for irritable bowel syndrome or any other functional gastrointestinal disorder.64Selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors may be useful when irritable bowel syndrome is accompanied and exacerbated by a mood disorder. Although evidence to support its use is lacking, this class of drug may also be tried if a tricyclic antidepressant fails.

Serotonin-3–Receptor Antagonists

Serotonin-3 receptors are also located on enteric nervous system sensory neurons.74 Serotonin is released by gastrointestinal enteroendocrine cells after mucosal stimulation, diffuses to the nerve endings, and stimulates peristalsis by binding to serotonin-3 and serotonin-4 receptors located on enteric nerves.75 Activated serotonin-3 receptors stimulate intestinal motility, secretion, and sensation. The motor effects of serotonin-3–receptorantagonists include a reduced rate of colonic transit, reduced gastrocolic reflex, and increased colonic compliance.76,77,78,79 The antagonists appear to reduce intestinal sensitivity to distention in humans as well as in several animal models.80,81,82 The serotonin-3–receptor antagonist alosetron increases colonic compliance in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and may reduce sensitivity to balloon distention.27,79 The clinical result of alosetron is a reduction in diarrhea and urgency. All these effects address the known physiological abnormalities in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

In two large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, alosetron (1 mg twice daily) was beneficial in women with irritable bowel syndrome who did not have constipation.54,55 An earlier dose-finding study indicated that a dosage of 1 mg twice daily was most effective and that its benefits were restricted to women. A response was reported in 43 percent of subjects in one study (an absolute increase of 17 percent, as compared with the rate in the placebo group; P<0.001) and 41 percent in the other (an absolute increase of 12 percent, as compared with the rate in the placebo group; P<0.05). The use of alosetron is associated with improved quality of life, as compared with placebo, in the dietary, social, and physical domains.83 Constipation was a side effect in 25 to 30 percent of subjects, explaining, in part, the 10 percent dropout rate. Alosetron was reported to be superior to mebeverine, an antispasmodic agent, for pain associated with irritable bowel syndrome (e.g., rates of adequate pain relief were 10 to 13 percentage points higher at two and three months) in a multicenter European trial.56 Although the incidence of side effects was similar in each treatment group, constipation was more common in the alosetron group (22 percent).

After the introduction of alosetron, ischemic colitis was diagnosed in approximately 1 of 700 patients who took the drug.84,85 Consequently, the drug was withdrawn from the market by the manufacturer. In part as a result of lobbying by patient-advocacy groups, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized the reintroduction of alosetron in June 2002 under specific guidelines that require patients to sign a consent form and prescribing physicians to sign a certificate.86 The drug again became available in late 2002.  Other drugs in this class are under development, although their safety and efficacy are unknown.

Serotonin-4–Receptor Agonists

Tegaserod, a drug similar to the prokinetic agent cisapride, is a partial agonist of the serotonin-4 receptor. Peristalsis is coordinated by neurons of the enteric nervous system that release other mediators after the activation of serotonin-4 receptors.87,88,89 In healthy volunteers, 6 mg of tegaserod twice daily accelerated gastric emptying and small-bowel transit.89 The rate of colonic transit was slightly accelerated 48 hours after the ingestion of radiolabeled pellets, but not at 24 hours.89 In patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, a 2-mg dose of tegaserod twice daily accelerates small-bowel transit and cecal filling but has no effect on gastric emptying or total colonic transit.90

Three large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of tegaserod for constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome indicate that it provides symptomatic benefit.28,52,53 Tegaserod (6 mg twice daily — the FDA-approved dose) for three months is associated with increased response rates at one and three months, as compared with placebo, leading to reductions in the symptoms of pain and constipation. In the last month of therapy, 52 percent of patients taking tegaserod had an improvement in the global symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome — a value that was 9.3 percentage points higher than that in the placebo group.28,52,53 Available studies suggest that these benefits occur in women but not men, although the studies were underpowered from a statistical viewpoint to detect sex-based differences.

Tegaserod has been approved by the FDA for use for up to 12 weeks in women with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. The side effects of tegaserod are generally mild, with diarrhea, generally brief, the most prominent (occurring in 10 percent of patients). For unclear reasons cholecystectomy was performed more frequently in patients who received tegaserod (0.17 percent) than in those given placebo (0.06 percent).91

Other Agents

A variety of other agents have been considered for the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, with some reports of benefit. Antibiotics have been suggested as a treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. Recently, small-bowel overgrowth by enteric bacteria has been cited as a cause of the symptoms.92 In a subsequent randomized, double-blind trial, 111 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (84 percent with small-bowel overgrowth as suggested by the results of a lactulose hydrogen breath test) were treated with the antibiotic neomycin or placebo. The percentage of patients with at least 50 percent improvement in the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome after one week of treatment was significantly greater in the neomycin group (43 percent) than the placebo group (23 percent).93 However, the follow-up lasted only seven days, and the durability of such a response is unknown. Studies of methods to reduce small-bowel bacteria without antibiotics in patients with irritable bowel syndrome are warranted.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled 16-week trial of herbal therapy that used a validated survey and involved 116 patients with irritable bowel syndrome indicated that gastrointestinal symptoms improved in patients taking a mixture of herbs. Herbal mixtures individualized for each patient by Chinese medical practitioners were compared with a standardized mixture of 20 herbs and found to offer no advantage.94 Whether diarrhea or constipation improved most was not reported. Herbal therapy might be useful but requires more robust data plus a determination of the substance or substances responsible for the effects.

Peppermint oil has been advocated as a treatment for irritable bowel syndrome and can be obtained without prescription. There are positive and negative data regarding its use in irritable bowel syndrome.95 Peppermint oil appears to have direct relaxing effects on gastrointestinal smooth muscle, so it might act as an antispasmodic agent. Peppermint oil relaxes the lower esophageal sphincter, and heartburn related to acid reflux limits its use.

Leuprolide, a gonadotropin-releasing–hormone antagonist, may be moderately beneficial for irritable bowel syndrome in women.96,97 The published trials were not blinded (owing to the presence of amenorrhea in the treatment group) and had vague entry criteria. The medical menopause this drug induces is not without risks, and leuprolide cannot be recommended for irritable bowel syndrome.

Future Therapies

Increased understanding of neurotransmitters and hormones mediating gastrointestinal motility and sensation will probably lead to novel treatments for irritable bowel syndrome. Compounds under investigation include cholecystokinin-A–receptor antagonists, neurokinin-1– and neurokinin-3–receptor antagonists, {kappa} (peripheral) opiate agonists, {alpha}2-adrenergic agonists, and muscarinic-3–receptor antagonists. These agents may reduce the sensitivity or motility of the gut. Probiotics have also been used to alter gut flora, and preliminary data indicate that they may be beneficial in irritable bowel syndrome.98

Approach to Treatment

Because irritable bowel syndrome is a disorder of bowel motility and sensation that is exacerbated by psychosocial stressors, treatment is most successful when a multicomponent, comprehensive approach is used (Figure 2). It is important to explain and reassure patients about the origin of their symptoms and to let patients take an active approach to management that is overseen by their physician. Bowel-directed therapies should target specific types of gastrointestinal dysfunction, such as diarrhea or constipation, and prescription medication should be used judiciously when symptoms do not respond to nonprescription remedies or are severe. Finally, stress management or psychotherapy should be used when such measures do not adequately relieve symptoms or when psychological factors are prominent.99,100,101,102 The benefits of multicomponent therapy for irritable bowel syndrome have recently been reviewed by both American and British gastroenterology societies.99,102 Given the psychosocial factors involved and the limited benefits of current pharmacologic therapies, the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome requires physicians to attend to the minds as well as the bodies of their patients in order to help them find relief.

View larger version(39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2.Treatment Strategy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

Treatment is individualized on the basis of the type and severity of symptoms. When bowel-directed therapies for diarrhea or constipation are inadequate or when pain is a prominent finding, therapy with antispasmodic drugs is useful, particularly for postprandial symptoms. These agents are effective when given on an as-needed basis, allowing the patient to take an active role in management. A combined anxiolytic–antispasmodic agent is helpful for use as needed in patients with anxiety or refractory disease. Tricyclic antidepressants in a low dose are helpful for pain symptoms when antispasmodic agents fail or provide only partial relief. Tricyclic antidepressants can be combined with other agents such as antispasmodics. The prokinetic tegaserod is effective for women with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. It is a reasonable addition when fiber or laxatives and antispasmodic agents are unsuccessful. When pain is the predominant symptom, tricyclic antidepressants would appear to be preferred over tegaserod on the basis of their mechanism of action, rather than clinical data. Alosetron is helpful for women with refractory diarrhea-predominant symptoms in whom loperamide, antispasmodic agents, and tricyclic antidepressants have failed. Patients should be counseled regarding the risk of constipation and ischemic colitis with alosetron therapy. Pharmacologic therapy alone is likely to be ineffective for irritable bowel syndrome when ongoing psychosocial problems remain undetected or untreated.11



Supported by a grant (DK 57047) from the National Institutes of Health.

Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, and the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Mertz at Nashville Gastrointestinal Specialists, 4230 Harding Rd., Suite 309 W., Nashville, TN 37205.



  1. Drossman DA, Andruzzi E, Temple RD, et al. U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders: prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1569-1580. [ISI][Medline]
  2. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF. Functional bowel disorders. In: Drossman DA, Corrazziari E, Talley NJ, Thompson WG, Whitehead WE, eds. Rome II: the functional gastrointestinal disorders. 2nd ed. McLean, Va.: Degnon, 2000:351-96.
  3. Vanner SJ, Depew WT, Paterson WG, et al. Predictive value of the Rome criteria for diagnosing the irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2912-2917. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Tolliver BA, Herrera JL, DiPalma JA. Evaluation of patients who meet clinical criteria for irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:176-178. [ISI][Medline]
  5. Drossman DA, McKee DC, Sandler RS, et al. Psychological factors in the irritable bowel syndrome: a multivariate study of patients and nonpatients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1988;95:701-708. [ISI][Medline]
  6. Talley NJ, Boyce PM, Jones M. Predictors of health care seeking for irritable bowel syndrome: a population based study. Gut 1997;41:394-398. [Abstract/Full Text]
  7. Drossman DA, Patrick DL, Whitehead WE, et al. Further validation of the IBS-QOL: a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:999-1007. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Gralnek IM, Hays RD, Kilbourne A, Naliboff B, Mayer EA. The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life. Gastroenterology 2000;119:654-660. [ISI][Medline]
  9. El-Serag H, Olden K, Bjorkman D. Health-related quality of life among persons with irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:1171-1185. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Whitehead WE, Bosmajian L, Zonderman AB, Costa PT Jr, Schuster MM. Symptoms of psychologic distress associated with irritable bowel syndrome: comparison of community and medical clinical samples. Gastroenterology 1988;95:709-714. [ISI][Medline]
  11. Bennett EJ, Tennant CC, Piesse C, Badcock C-A, Kellow JE. Level of chronic life stress predicts clinical outcome in irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 1998;43:256-261. [Abstract/Full Text]
  12. Rogers J, Henry MM, Misiewicz JJ. Increased segmental activity and intraluminal pressures in the sigmoid colon of patients with the irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 1989;30:634-641. [Abstract]
  13. Ritchie J. Pain from distension of the pelvic colon by inflating a balloon in the irritable colon syndrome. Gut 1973;14:125-132. [ISI][Medline]
  14. Kellow JE, Phillips SF. Altered small bowel motility in irritable bowel syndrome is correlated with symptoms. Gastroenterology 1987;92:1885-1893. [ISI][Medline]
  15. McKee DP, Quigley EMM. Intestinal motility in irritable bowel syndrome: is IBS a motility disorder? 1. Definition of IBS and colonic motility. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1761-1772. [ISI][Medline]
  16. Mertz H, Naliboff B, Munakata J, Niazi N, Mayer EA. Altered rectal perception is a biological marker of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1995;109:40-52. [Erratum, Gastroenterology 1997;113:1054.] [ISI][Medline]
  17. Rao SSC, Hatfield RA, Suls JM, Chamberlain MJ. Psychological and physical stress induce differential effects on human colonic motility. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:985-990. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Ford MJ, Camilleri M, Zinsmeister AR, Hanson RB. Psychosensory modulation of colonic sensation in the human transverse and sigmoid colon. Gastroenterology 1995;109:1772-1780. [ISI][Medline]
  19. Welgan P, Meshkinpour H, Beeler M. Effect of anger on colon motor and myoelectric activity in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1988;94:1150-1156. [ISI][Medline]
  20. Stam R, Croiset G, Akkermans LMA, Wiegant VM. Sensitization of the colonic response to novel stress after previous stressful experience. Am J Physiol 1996;271:R1270-R1273. [ISI][Medline]
  21. Al-Chaer ED, Kawasaki M, Pasricha PJ. A new model of chronic visceral hypersensitivity in adult rats induced by colon irritation during postnatal development. Gastroenterology 2000;119:1275-1285.
  22. Fukudo S, Nomura T, Hongo M. Impact of corticotropin-releasing hormone on gastrointestinal motility and adrenocorticotropic hormone in normal controls and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 1998;42:845-849. [Abstract/Full Text]
  23. Owens DM, Nelson DK, Talley NJ. The irritable bowel syndrome: long-term prognosis and the physician-patient interaction. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:107-112. [Abstract/Full Text]
  24. Nanda R, James R, Smith H, Dudley CR, Jewell DP. Food intolerance and the irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 1989;30:1099-1104. [Abstract]
  25. Serra J, Salvioli B, Azpiroz F, Malagelada J-R. Lipid-induced intestinal gas retention in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2002;123:700-706. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Colwell LJ, Prather CM, Phillips SF, Zinsmeister AR. Effects of an irritable bowel syndrome educational class on health-promoting behaviors and symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:901-905.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Camilleri M, Mayer EA, Drossman DA, et al. Improvement of pain and bowel function in female irritable bowel patients with alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;13:1149-1159.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Muller-Lissner SA, Fumagalli I, Bardhan KD, et al. Tegaserod, a 5-HT(4) receptor partial agonist, relieves symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients with abdominal pain, bloating and constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:1655-1666. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Muller-Lissner SA. Effect of wheat bran on weight of stool and gastrointestinal transit time: a meta analysis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296:615-617. [Medline]
  30. Lucey MR, Clark ML, Lowndes JO, Dawson AM. Is bran efficacious in irritable bowel syndrome? A double blind placebo controlled crossover study. Gut 1987;28:221-225. [Abstract]
  31. Prior A, Whorwell PJ. Double blind study of ispaghula in irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 1987;28:1510-1513. [Abstract]
  32. Cann PA, Read NW, Holdsworth CD. What is the benefit of coarse wheat bran in patients with irritable bowel syndrome? Gut 1984;25:168-173. [Abstract]
  33. Francis CY, Whorwell PJ. Bran and irritable bowel syndrome: time for reappraisal. Lancet 1994;344:39-40. [ISI][Medline]
  34. Guthrie E, Creed F, Dawson D, Tomenson B. A controlled trial of psychological treatment for the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 1991;100:450-457. [ISI][Medline]
  35. Whorwell PJ, Prior A, Faragher EB. Controlled trial of hypnotherapy in the treatment of severe refractory irritable-bowel syndrome. Lancet 1984;2:1232-1234. [Medline]
  36. Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Ottosson J-O, Dotevall G. Controlled study of psychotherapy in irritable bowel syndrome. Lancet 1983;2:589-592. [Medline]
  37. Heymann-Monnikes I, Arnold R, Florin I, Herda C, Melfsen S, Monnikes H. The combination of medical treatment plus multicomponent behavior therapy is superior to medical treatment alone in the therapy of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:981-994. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  38. Talley NJ, Owen BK, Boyce P, Paterson K. Psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: a critique of controlled treatment trials. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:277-283. [ISI][Medline]
  39. Drossman DA, Toner BB, Whitehead WE, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy versus education and desipramine versus placebo for moderate to severe functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2003;125:19-31. [ISI][Medline]
  40. Mertz H, Naliboff B, Mayer EA. Symptoms and physiology in severe chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:131-138. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  41. Mertz H, Naliboff B, Mayer EA. Physiology of refractory chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:609-615. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  42. Attar A, Lemann M, Ferguson A, et al. Comparison of a low dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution with lactulose for treatment of chronic constipation. Gut 1999;44:226-230. [Abstract/Full Text]
  43. Corazziari E, Badiali D, Bazzocchi G, et al. Long term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low daily doses of isosmotic polyethylene glycol electrolyte balanced solution (PMF-100) in the treatment of functional chronic constipation. Gut 2000;46:522-526. [Abstract/Full Text]
  44. Smith BA. Effect of irritant purgatives on the myenteric plexus in man and the mouse. Gut 1968;9:139-143. [ISI][Medline]
  45. Cann PA, Read NW, Holdsworth CD, Barends D. Role of loperamide and placebo in management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Dig Dis Sci 1984;29:239-247. [ISI][Medline]
  46. Sciarretta G, Furno A, Mazzoni M, Malaguti P. Post-cholecystectomy diarrhea: evidence of bile acid malabsorption assessed by SeHCAT test. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1852-1854. [ISI][Medline]
  47. Chey WY, Jin HO, Lee MH, et al. Colonic motility abnormality in patients with irritable bowel syndrome exhibiting abdominal pain and diarrhea. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1499-1506. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  48. Sullivan MA, Cohen S, Snape WJ Jr. Colonic myoelectrical activity in irritable-bowel syndrome: effect of eating and anticholinergics. N Engl J Med 1978;298:878-883. [Abstract]
  49. Poynard T, Regimbeau C, Benhamou Y. Meta-analysis of smooth muscle relaxants in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:355-361. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  50. Jailwala J, Imperiale TF, Kroenke K. Pharmacologic treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:136-147. [Abstract/Full Text]
  51. Jackson JL, O'Malley PG, Tomkins G, Balden E, Santoro J, Kroenke K. Treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders with antidepressant medications: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 2000;108:65-72.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  52. Novick J, Miner P, Krause R, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tegaserod in female patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:1877-1888. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  53. Kellow J, Lee OY, Chang FY, et al. An Asia-Pacific, double blind, placebo controlled, randomised study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tegaserod in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2003;52:671-676. [Abstract/Full Text]
  54. Camilleri M, Chey WY, Mayer EA, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of the serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist alosetron in women with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2001;16:1733-1740.
  55. Camilleri M, Northcutt AR, Kong S, Dukes GE, McSorley D, Mangel AW. Efficacy and safety of alosetron in women with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:1035-1040. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  56. Jones RH, Holtmann G, Rodrigo L, et al. Alosetron relieves pain and improves bowel function compared with mebeverine in female nonconstipated irritable bowel syndrome patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;13:1419-1427. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  57. Poynard T, Naveau S, Mory B, et al. Meta-analysis of smooth muscle relaxants in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994;8:499-510. [ISI][Medline]
  58. Rhodes JB, Abrams JH, Manning RT. Controlled clinical trial of sedative-anticholinergic drugs in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Pharmacol 1978;18:340-345. [Abstract]
  59. Lichstein J, Mayer JD. Drug therapy in the unstable bowel (irritable colon): a 15-month double blind clinical study in 75 cases of response to a prolonged-acting belladonna alkaloid-phenobarbital mixture or placebo. J Chronic Dis 1959;9:394-404. [Medline]
  60. King JC. Anisotropine methylbromide for relief of gastrointestinal spasm: double-blind crossover comparison study with belladonna alkaloids and phenobarbital. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1966;8:535-541.[ISI][Medline]
  61. Narducci F, Snape WJ, Battle WM, London RL, Cohen S. Increased colonic motility during exposure to a stressful situation. Dig Dis Sci 1985;30:40-44. [ISI][Medline]
  62. Walsh TD. Antidepressants in chronic pain. Clin Neuropharmacol 1983;6:271-295. [ISI][Medline]
  63. Max MB, Culnane M, Schafer SC, et al. Amitriptyline relieves diabetic neuropathy pain in patients with normal or depressed mood. Neurology 1987;37:589-596. [Abstract]
  64. McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Antidepressants and chronic pain. BMJ 1997;314:763-764. [Full Text]
  65. Su X, Gebhart GF. Effects of tricyclic antidepressants on mechanosensitive pelvic nerve afferent fibers innervating the rat colon. Pain 1998;76:105-114. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  66. Botney M, Fields HL. Amitriptyline potentiates morphine analgesia by a direct action on the central nervous system. Ann Neurol 1983;13:160-164. [ISI][Medline]
  67. Gorelick AB, Koshy SS, Hooper FG, Bennett TC, Chey WD, Hasler WL. Differential effects of amitriptyline on perception of somatic and visceral stimulation in healthy humans. Am J Physiol 1998;275:G460-G466. [ISI][Medline]
  68. Poulsen L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Brosen K, Nielsen KK, Gram LF, Sindrup SH. The hypoalgesic effect of imipramine in different human experimental pain models. Pain 1995;60:287-293. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  69. Peghini PL, Katz PO, Castell DO. Imipramine decreases oesophageal pain perception in human male volunteers. Gut 1998;42:807-813. [Abstract/Full Text]
  70. Mertz HM, Fass R, Kodner A, Yan-Go F, Fullerton S, Mayer EA. Effect of amitriptyline on symptoms, sleep, and visceral perception in patients with functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:160-165.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  71. Poitras P, Riberdy Poitras M, Plourde V, Boivin M, Verrier P. Evolution of visceral sensitivity in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 2002;47:914-920. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  72. Greengaum DS, Mayle JE, Vanegeren LE, et al. Effects of desipramine on irritable bowel syndrome compared with atropine and placebo. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:257-266. [ISI][Medline]
  73. Lancaster-Smith MJ, Prout BJ, Pinto T, Anderson JA, Schiff AA. Influence of drug treatment on the irritable bowel syndrome and its interaction with psychoneurotic morbidity. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1982;66:33-41. [ISI][Medline]
  74. Glatzle RG, Sternini C, Robin C, et al. Expression of 5-HT3 receptors in the rat gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology 2002;123:217-226. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  75. Jin JG, Foxx-Orenstein AE, Grider JR. Propulsion in guinea pig colon induced by 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT) via 5-HT4 and 5-HT3 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;288:93-97. [Abstract/Full Text]
  76. Talley NL, Phillips SF, Haddad A, et al. GR 38032F (ondansetron), a selective 5HT3 receptor antagonist, slows colonic transit in healthy man. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:477-480. [ISI][Medline]
  77. Bjornsson ES, Chey WD, Ladabaum U, et al. Differential 5-HT3 mediation of human gastrocolonic response and colonic peristaltic reflex. Am J Physiol 1998;275:G498-G505. [ISI][Medline]
  78. Gunput MD. Clinical pharmacology of alosetron. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999;13:Suppl 2:70-76. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  79. Delvaux M, Louvel D, Mamet JP, Campos-Oriola R, Frexinos J. Effect of alosetron on responses to colonic distension in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12:849-855.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  80. Miura M, Lawson DC, Clary EM, Mangel AW, Pappas TN. Central modulation of rectal distension-induced blood pressure changes by alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Dig Dis Sci 1999;44:20-24.[ISI][Medline]
  81. Prior A, Read NW. Reduction of rectal sensitivity and post-prandial motility by granisetron, a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1993;7:175-180.[ISI][Medline]
  82. Kozlowski CM, Green A, Grundy D, Boissonade FM, Bountra C. The 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist alosetron inhibits the colorectal distention induced depressor response and spinal c-fos expression in the anaesthetized rat. Gut 2000;46:474-480. [Abstract/Full Text]
  83. Watson ME, Lacey L, Kong S, et al. Alosetron improves quality of life in women with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:455-459. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  84. Friedel D, Thomas R, Fisher RS. Ischemic colitis during treatment with alosetron. Gastroenterology 2001;120:557-560. [ISI][Medline]
  85. Medication guide for Lotronex tablets (alosetron hydrochloride). 2002. (Accessed October 30, 2003, at http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/lotronex/medguide060502.htm.)
  86. Prescribing program for Lotronex: physician attestation of qualifications and acceptance of responsibilities. 2002. (Accessed October 30, 2003, athttp://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/lotronex/physicianagreement0602.htm.)
  87. Grider JR, Foxx-Orenstein AE, Jin JG. 5-Hydroxytryptamine4 receptor agonists initiate the peristaltic reflex in human, rat, and guinea pig intestine. Gastroenterology 1998;115:370-380. [ISI][Medline]
  88. Foxx-Orenstein AE, Kuemmerle JF, Grider JR. Distinct 5-HT receptors mediate the peristaltic reflex induced by mucosal stimuli in human and guinea pig intestine. Gastroenterology 1996;111:1281-1290.[ISI][Medline]
  89. Degen L, Matzinger D, Merz M, et al. Tegaserod, a 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist, accelerates gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in healthy male subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:1745-1751.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  90. Prather CM, Camilleri M, Zinsmeister AR, McKinzie S, Thomforde G. Tegaserod accelerates orocecal transit in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2000;118:463-468. [ISI][Medline]
  91. FDA approves first treatment for women with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. FDA talk paper. July 24, 2002. (Accessed October 30, 2003, athttp://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2002/ANS01160.html.)
  92. Pimentel M, Chow EJ, Lin HC. Eradication of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:3503-3506. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  93. Pimentel M, Chow EJ, Lin HC. Normalization of lactulose breath testing correlates with symptom improvement in irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:412-419. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  94. Bensoussan A, Talley NJ, Hing M, Menzies R, Guo A, Ngu M. Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998;280:1585-1589.[Abstract/Full Text]
  95. Pittler MH, Ernst E. Peppermint oil for irritable bowel syndrome: a critical review and metaanalysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:1131-1135. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  96. Mathias JR, Clench MH, Reeves-Darby VG, et al. Effect of leuprolide acetate in patients with moderate to severe functional bowel disease: double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:1155-1162.[ISI][Medline]
  97. Mathias JR, Clench MH, Abell TL, et al. Effect of leuprolide acetate in treatment of abdominal pain and nausea in premenopausal women with functional bowel disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:1347-1355. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  98. Kim HJ, Camilleri M, McKinzie S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a probiotic, VSL#3, on gut transit and symptoms in diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:895-904. [ISI][Medline]
  99. Drossman DA, Camilleri M, Mayer EA, Whitehead WE. AGA technical review on irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2002;123:2108-2131. [CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  100. Horwitz BJ, Fisher RS. The irritable bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1846-1850. [Full Text]
  101. Thompson WG. A strategy for management of the irritable bowel. Am J Gastroenterol 1986;81:95-100. [ISI][Medline]
  102. Jones J, Boorman J, Cann P, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of the irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2000;47:Suppl 2:ii1-ii19. [Full Text]